The article discusses the ongoing division within conservative circles regarding the US's global military presence. Historically, a significant split exists between those supporting the international order backed by US military power and those viewing it as a drain on resources. This divide has gained prominence post-9/11, as public skepticism towards interventions has risen, particularly among younger people influenced by the costly wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. Donald Trump's administration reflects this dynamic, maintaining military actions abroad while simultaneously asserting a populist, anti-war stance to attract voters disillusioned with traditional foreign policy.
Divisions on the right over US military support persist, with a faction viewing it as a resource drain—an outlook amplified since post-9/11 anti-terror interventions.
The long-term consequences of US military actions have led to skepticism from younger generations, who question the efficacy of America's global security architecture.
Trump's presidency has revealed a duality where he continues military interventions while also positioning himself as an anti-war candidate to appeal to disillusioned voters.
With public sentiment shifting, Trump has promised to end ongoing wars, reflecting his awareness of the growing desire among voters for change in US foreign policy.
Collection
[
|
...
]