Transferring Retirement Accounts: Why Timing Your Move to Fidelity or Schwab Won't Beat the Market
Briefly

Transferring Retirement Accounts: Why Timing Your Move to Fidelity or Schwab Won't Beat the Market
An investor felt anxious after an ACAT transfer request from TIAA to Fidelity did not complete following a market up day. The key reframing is that long-term investors are as likely to miss down days as up days, based on historical proportions of up versus down months and years. ACAT transfers involve operational timing and custodial friction, including that TIAA may require its own specific outbound paperwork and may not accept Schwab paperwork. A clean transfer can be as quick as about five days, while typical timing can extend to a couple of weeks. Market context can add emotional pressure, but the transfer window remains a small, probabilistic event relative to long-term horizons.
"“You gotta remember that you're a long-term investor. I know that. And you're as likely to miss a down day as you are up days,” he said, citing the rough base rate: “I think it's 75% of the months are up and 25% are down. It's about the same when it comes to years. It's about 3 out of 4 years the market's up and 1 quarter when it's down.”"
"“TIAA and Charles Schwab don't get along all that well,” he said, adding that the same friction “may be the same with Fidelity.” A clean ACAT “could be as quick as 5 days” and typically takes “a couple of weeks at the outside if they're done right.” TIAA also requires its own outbound paperwork: “TIAA does not accept any Schwab paperwork. You have to, if you're moving money from TIAA to Schwab, you gotta use their paperwork.”"
"“recently there was a big up day in the market and I had put in a ACAT transfer request from TIAA to Fidelity, and it didn't go through,” and admitting “I know logically it shouldn't make any difference outside of the time that the money would be out of the market, but it made me nervous.”"
Read at 24/7 Wall St.
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]