
A worker contributing $9,000 per year for 35 years to age 65 assumes a 7% gross annual return. Without fees, the contributions compound to about $1,244,000 using a 35-year annuity factor near 138. With a 0.80% all-in fee drag, the net return falls to about 6.2%, shrinking the compounding factor and ending the same contributions near $1,045,000. The difference is roughly $200,000 paid over time to fund managers, recordkeepers, and intermediaries. The fee drag can equal more than two and a half years of full-time gross pay at average hourly earnings and can consume nearly a fifth of the return available from a 10-year Treasury benchmark.
"A 30-year-old earning $90,000 who routes 10% of pay into a 401(k) assumes the system is working. Contributions go in, the balance grows, the statement looks healthy. What the statement does not show is the slow leak: a fraction of a percent skimmed off the top each year that quietly compounds against the worker for 35 years."
"The $200,000 number, walked through Take the same worker, contributing $9,000 a year for 35 years to age 65. Assume a 7% gross annual return, a standard long-run equity assumption that financial planners use as a baseline. With no fee drag, the math runs $9,000 multiplied by the 35-year annuity factor of about 138, which lands near $1,244,000."
"Now apply the 0.80% drag. The net return falls to 6.2%, the compounding factor shrinks, and the same $9,000 a year ends at roughly $1,045,000. The difference is right around $200,000, paid invisibly to fund managers, recordkeepers, and intermediaries the worker never met."
"Plan size drives plan cost. The BrightScope/ICI Defined Contribution Plan Profile consistently shows that small plans, those under roughly $50 million in assets, carry materially higher asset-weighted expense ratios than mega plans, because fixed administrative costs"
Read at 24/7 Wall St.
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]