
"Ramsey's reasoning is this. The more individual monthly payments you collect from Social Security, the more total income from the program you might get in your lifetime. You can't predict your own life expectancy. But claiming Social Security early could put more money in your pocket in total if you don't end up living a very long life."
"If you delay your Social Security claim past FRA, your monthly benefits get boosted and grow 8% a year until you turn 70. But if you claim Social Security before reaching FRA, your benefits will be slashed permanently."
"Ramsey's Social Security advice has some serious problems. First, while some people may pass away sooner than expected, you never know if you might live longer than expected. And reducing your Social Security payments could mean struggling later in life if your savings run out."
Social Security claiming decisions have lifelong financial consequences. Full retirement age is 67 for those born in 1960 or later, with benefits increasing 8% annually if delayed until age 70. Claiming at 62 permanently reduces monthly benefits. Dave Ramsey controversially advocates claiming at 62, arguing that collecting more monthly payments over a lifetime could yield greater total income if life expectancy is shorter than average. However, this strategy presents risks, as individuals cannot predict their actual lifespan. Claiming early reduces monthly payments permanently, potentially causing financial hardship later if savings deplete and Social Security becomes the primary income source.
#social-security-claiming-strategy #retirement-planning #early-vs-delayed-benefits #longevity-risk #financial-decision-making
Read at 24/7 Wall St.
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]