
A plan assumes $1 million in a traditional 401(k) grows to $3 million by age 63, then supports $100,000 annual withdrawals from age 63 to 70. It also includes $500,000 for a more expensive house at retirement, with 90% equity index funds and 10% bond funds. The main concern is sequence-of-returns risk once withdrawals begin. If equities fall sharply in the first withdrawal year, the stock portion can drop dramatically, and the portfolio may not recover because withdrawals continue. The same average return over time can produce very different results depending on whether losses occur early or late. A more defensive allocation is needed for the withdrawal “gap” period.
"“I can all but guarantee you, listener, something unexpected will happen over the next 12 years,” he said, and warned that “90% equities could crash, and a lot of the dollars you may need could be full gone.”"
"Saulnier and Stein are right. A 90/10 split works for accumulation but is dangerous for someone pulling roughly a third of every year's spending from the portfolio within a decade. The reason: sequence-of-returns risk. The order in which good and bad years arrive matters enormously once withdrawals begin, even if the long-run average return is identical."
"Here is the mechanic. Imagine the listener hits age 63 with the projected $3 million and starts pulling $100,000 a year. If equities drop 35% in year one, the 90% stock sleeve falls from $2.7 million to about $1.75 million. After the $100,000 withdrawal, the portfolio is near $1.95 million. To get back to even, the remaining stocks now need to nearly double while she keeps withdrawing."
"The current environment makes this concrete. University of Michigan consumer sentiment sits at 49.8 in April 2026, the lowest reading in 12 mon"
#retirement-planning #401k-withdrawals #asset-allocation #sequence-of-returns-risk #stock-vs-bond-allocation
Read at 24/7 Wall St.
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]