"It feels cruel to insist someone keep attempting something they "can't" do-or to hold them to a standard they claim they cannot meet. Weaponized incompetence exploits that reluctance. It misattributes strategic failure as a skill deficit or honest mistake, allowing the offending party to avoid responsibility, discourage future requests, or exert control. In this dynamic, the offending party is framed as the victim, while their frustrated partner is recast as unreasonable, demanding, or a "nag.""
"Weaponized incompetence is more than a one-off mistake. It's a repeated behavior that continues after the harm has been named. It often includes defensiveness, emotional punishment, or refusal to engage in repair or problem-solving. Common features include: A negative or harmful consequence for another person Resistance to accountability or collaboration Defensiveness, shutdown, minimization, or retaliation The defining factor isn't whether someone does a task "wrong." It's how they respond once the impact of that failure is clear."
Weaponized incompetence occurs when someone intentionally performs poorly to avoid responsibility, discourage future requests, or exert control. The behavior leverages social reluctance to hold apparently incapable people accountable, making it feel cruel to insist they improve. Perpetrators misattribute strategic failure as a skill deficit or honest mistake and frame themselves as victims while casting frustrated partners as unreasonable. The pattern is repeated and persists after harm is identified, often accompanied by defensiveness, shutdown, minimization, emotional punishment, or refusal to collaborate on repair. Honest mistakes differ by prompting repair-oriented, collaborative solutions to prevent recurrence.
Read at Psychology Today
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]