The defendants argue that the plaintiffs have not sufficiently demonstrated how the membership requirement impacts competition in the market, claiming it doesn't constitute an antitrust violation.
The plaintiffs assert that the necessity for all agents and brokers in Michigan to be members of NAR and local boards to access Realcomp’s MLS represents an antitrust violation.
The defendants' motion to dismiss emphasizes that the plaintiffs have failed to articulate a clear tying claim in their first amended complaint, echoing concerns raised in their original filing.
The ongoing Hardy antitrust lawsuit questions the legitimacy of membership requirements for listing properties on Realcomp, highlighting conflicting definitions of fair competition.
Collection
[
|
...
]