"Construction sites, development teams, and project organizations operate under pressures familiar to military units: tight timelines, limited resources, high stakes, and the need to coordinate across disciplines. Success relies on trust, clear roles, discipline, and shared awareness, while failure often stems from misalignment and poor communication. It quickly became clear that, while construction mirrors the military's structure and complexity, it sometimes lacks the systems and norms that enable those environments to function effectively at scale."
"In the industry, I saw firsthand how finger-pointing', fragmented tools, legacy software, and disconnected data create blind spots between stakeholders. Financial data lives in one system, schedules in another, and field updates elsewhere often reconciled manually, late, or sometimes not at all. The result is a lack of shared truth across owners, lenders, project managers, and site teams. In the military, incomplete or delayed information can jeopardize a mission. In construction, it jeopardizes budgets, schedules, safety, and trust."
Transitioning from military service to construction revealed striking operational similarities: tight timelines, limited resources, high stakes, and cross-discipline coordination. Success depends on trust, clear roles, discipline, and shared situational awareness. Military habits like accountability, respect for process, chain of command, and execution bias transfer well. The construction industry often lacks the systems and norms to scale such performance. Fragmented tools, legacy software, disconnected data, and finger-pointing create blind spots among owners, lenders, project managers, and site teams. Financials, schedules, and field updates live in separate systems and are reconciled manually or late, undermining budgets, schedules, safety, and trust.
Read at www.housingwire.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]