Federal lands amendment draws bipartisan rebuke
Briefly

Democratic leaders strongly criticized a recent proposal related to public lands, accusing sponsors of failing to notify fellow Democrats about significant changes that could affect many residents. Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto labeled the amendment a 'land grab' to benefit the Republican tax agenda. Interestingly, Republican Rep. Ryan Zinke emerged as an opponent, advocating against public land sales and emphasizing his commitment to preserving these lands. Zinke's outspoken stance highlights a rare instance of bipartisan concern for environmental issues within a politically charged landscape.
Democratic committee members expressed strong criticism towards a proposal seen as detrimental to public lands, underscoring the need for greater communication in policy impacts.
Sen. Cortez Masto denounced the amendment as a 'land grab,' indicating significant pushback against Republican priorities that threaten state welfare.
Rep. Zinke, emerging as a bipartisan opponent, emphasized his commitment to opposing public land sales, stating that such actions would irreversibly impact access and federal land management.
Zinke's metaphor of his opposition as his 'San Juan Hill' signals the depth of his resolve against compromising public land integrity for financial concessions.
Read at www.housingwire.com
[
|
]