There is a common misconception about GraphQL root fields; all types have fields, not just root types, leading to misunderstandings in usage and implementation.
The naming convention of calling the root query type 'Query' lacks specificity, leading to flat top-level fields resembling loose collections of functions, creating confusion with the notion of 'root fields'.
Top-level mutation fields execute in order, leading to the belief that they must have flatter namespaces, influencing design choices, although nested mutations work equally well.
Implementing top-level resolvers as functions or static methods at the library level showcases the impact of misconceptions about root fields in GraphQL implementation.
Collection
[
|
...
]