
"The overwhelming body of data-based evidence reveals that all of these lists lack validity: We have no reliable way of measuring leader competencies, and so no valid way of proving that the best leaders possess more of them than average leaders."
"Yes, it might be desirable for a leader to possess strategic thinking or executive presence or emotional intelligence, but the data shows that all of these skills are simply nice-to-haves."
"For every leader who excels at strategic thinking, you find a different excellent leader whose influence comes from their ability to build consensus."
"Virtually nothing in common at all. Look closely at the very best leaders you know. They were all so different, weren't they?"
The best leaders do not conform to a specific set of competencies. Data shows that traditional measures of leader effectiveness lack validity. Leaders excel through diverse strengths, such as strategic thinking, empathy, or salesmanship. Each influential leader has a unique style and approach, demonstrating that there is no single formula for effective leadership. Examples of diverse leaders illustrate this point, highlighting the individuality in their methods and impact.
Read at Big Think
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]