The article discusses the legal implications of custodial interrogation, emphasizing the importance of Miranda rights, which must be read in specific circumstances. It clarifies that individuals may be deemed 'in custody' even if not formally arrested, depending on their perceived freedom to leave. The Supreme Court's definition stresses that an interrogation becomes custodial when individuals feel unable to exit the situation. Despite this right to leave, most individuals do not successfully exercise it, often feeling uncomfortable or suspicious about leaving police questioning.
Custodial interrogation triggers important legal safeguards, like Miranda warnings. If not in custody, you may leave questioning, though most don’t exercise that right.
Miranda rights must be recited during custodial interrogations, even if the individual hasn’t been formally arrested, following a nuanced legal definition.
The U.S. Supreme Court defines custodial interrogation as questioning by law enforcement after someone has been deprived of their freedom significantly.
In custody means the situation feels restrictive enough that you might not feel free to leave, regardless of formal arrest.
Collection
[
|
...
]