"After protests from both and employees who did not sign up to support government mass surveillance-early reports show that ChaptGPT uninstalls rose nearly 300% after the company announced the deal Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, conceded that the initial agreement was "opportunistic and sloppy.""
"Trouble is, the U.S. government doesn't believe "consistent with applicable laws" means "no domestic surveillance." Instead, for the most part, the government has embraced a lax interpretation of "applicable law" that has blessed mass surveillance and large-scale violations of our civil liberties, and then fought tooth and nail to prevent courts from weighing in."
""Intentionally" is also doing an awful lot of work in that sentence. For years the government has insisted that the mass surveillance of U.S. persons only happens incidentally (read: not intentionally) because their communications with people both inside the United States and overseas are swept up in surveillance programs supposedly designed to only collect communications the United States."
OpenAI announced a partnership with the U.S. Department of Defense for AI applications, prompting significant backlash from employees and users concerned about surveillance and autonomous weapons use. CEO Sam Altman acknowledged the initial agreement was "opportunistic and sloppy." Following protests and a reported 300% increase in ChatGPT uninstalls, OpenAI added contractual language restricting intentional domestic surveillance of U.S. persons, citing constitutional and legal compliance. However, critics argue the government interprets "applicable laws" broadly to permit mass surveillance programs. The phrase "intentionally" creates ambiguity, as the government has historically classified mass surveillance as incidental rather than intentional when collecting communications involving overseas contacts.
Read at Electronic Frontier Foundation
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]