In the UK, expert Peter Sommer highlights the urgent need for reform in digital forensics, particularly regarding the admissibility of computer evidence. With the Ministry of Justice seeking feedback, Sommer points to issues surrounding the extraction and manual processing of digital evidence, which undermine its reliability. He notes that the legal system has operated under outdated principles since 1997, a situation made evident by incidents like the Post Office Horizon scandal. Sommer's response outlines the key digital evidence forms affected, including communications from various platforms, and emphasizes the pressing need for modernized standards.
Sommer argues that evidence extracted from digital communications, social media, and mobile phones is questionable due to unreliable extraction methods and the manual processing required.
Peter Sommer emphasizes that the reliability of digital evidence is threatened, calling for urgent reform in light of two decades without significant updates to evidence-gathering principles.
Collection
[
|
...
]