Aivi Luik's case highlights flaws in the anti-doping process, especially given that she was not tested and did not knowingly breach any rules.
Despite the lack of evidence from testing, Nado Italia still suspended Luik, raising significant questions about the fairness of the decision and the criteria they used.
Luik was charged retrospectively for an exemption application error made by her club, which seems unjust given her position and lack of wrongdoing.
Her lawyer emphasized the confusion surrounding the charge, as the regulations and procedures followed by the Italian anti-doping agency are not clear or transparent.
Collection
[
|
...
]