Kamala Harris is rebranding 'freedom' to mean a more activist government, claiming it encompasses safety, control over one’s body, and the right to vote.
Tim Walz critiques Republican definitions of freedom, arguing they advocate for governmental invasions into personal spaces, allowing polluters, and enabling banks to exploit the less fortunate.
Harris and Walz's campaign positions suggest they define freedom contrary to the historical view that emphasizes personal choice and limited government interference.
Historical lessons show that significant government power often leads to tyranny and oppression, contrasting with Harris and Walz's proposed greater government activism.
Collection
[
|
...
]