This week's roundup from Howard Bashman's How Appealing blog features several notable legal topics. Among them, discussions include new transparency rules impacting U.S.-El Salvador agreements, skepticism from an appeals court on AP's access to the White House, and a unique case from Oregon regarding whether a steak knife qualifies as a weapon. Additionally, the imminent Supreme Court argument by Kneedler, who has a distinguished record of representing the Solicitor General, points to significant legal challenges surrounding Trump's defiance of court orders.
A three-judge panel of the appeals court expressed skepticism regarding the government's claims of imminent harm in the case of AP's access to the White House.
Kneedler's impending judicial argument marks a significant moment, considering his extensive career as Solicitor General, where he has represented the government in numerous pivotal cases.
Collection
[
|
...
]