The recent ruling labeling Google's search engine as an 'illegal monopoly' sets a dangerous precedent for free enterprise and innovation across all sectors of the economy.
Competition policy works best when prioritizing consumers and innovation, not when it demonizes the size of companies; Judge Mehta's decision lacks concrete evidence of illegal conduct.
Mehta's ruling, while acknowledging Google as 'the best search engine', concluded anti-competitive behavior due to successful outcomes without providing explicit illegal activities.
This approach is detrimental for consumers and serves as a political win for an activist government and competitors unable to compete with Google's quality.
Collection
[
|
...
]