Charlotte Proudman argues that she faced higher scrutiny than male barristers, highlighting a disparity in how the Bar Standards Board treats comments based on gender.
Proudman’s attorney emphasized that several male barristers received no consequence for harsh criticisms of judges, while Proudman faced formal disciplinary charges.
The case against Proudman raises significant questions regarding gender equality in legal proceedings and whether women are held to a different standard than their male counterparts.
Proudman’s remarks criticized the judgment of a male judge, suggesting it reflected an outdated 'boys' club' mentality prevalent among men in powerful positions.
Collection
[
|
...
]