'Dignity Where There Was Little to Be Found': Inside the Fight for California Needle Exchange Programs | KQED
Briefly

Elerick argues that needle exchange programs should be approved based on public health evidence, emphasizing that public sentiment should not dictate health policy decisions.
Research indicates that harm reduction programs do not increase local drug use and significantly reduce the incidence of infections and overdoses, showcasing their efficacy.
Despite support from health agencies, local skepticism persists, with many people still holding negative views towards drug users and opposing their supportive programs.
The increase in California counties permitting needle exchange programs exemplifies a nationwide trend toward adopting harm reduction strategies in public health.
Read at Kqed
[
|
]