
"Choosing the right training content isn't about how much training content you offer. It's about how well that content fits the job it needs to do. The real training challenge is not content. It's fit We often hear that teams need more training. But when we dig deeper, the problem is rarely a lack of courses. It's a lack of focus. Training often fails because different needs get lumped together into one giant learning initiative. For instance, it's impossible to use the same approach for teaching introduction to Python as for harassment prevention."
"Most HR managers and L&D pros have been there. They want to help their people grow, so they start looking for the best training content. But "best" is a moving target. What works for a software engineer's technical upskilling won't work for a manager learning how to give feedback. And neither of those will help legal teams stay compliant with state laws. When trying to solve every training need with one massive, uncurated library, two things happen: training budget disappears, and learners stop clicking."
Training effectiveness depends on matching content to a specific job rather than maximizing volume. Different learning goals require different approaches—technical skill development, managerial coaching, and legal compliance each demand distinct formats, pacing, and outcomes. Offering a massive, uncurated library creates decision fatigue, lowers completion rates, and produces content-outcome mismatches. Organizations should curate content around defined jobs-to-be-done, clarify what each course must accomplish, and align learning investments with measurable outcomes. Better alignment of content fit with job needs supports skill development and employee retention, while unfocused catalogs waste budget and disengage learners.
Read at TalentLMS Blog
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]