Federal Judge Angel Kelley's decision to block a 15% cap on taxpayer coverage for indirect costs associated with NIH grants has raised significant concerns about the misuse of funds by universities. For instance, a study at Harvard, costing nearly $495,000, allocated a large portion for indirect costs, which are not itemized, raising questions about financial accountability. This scenario exemplifies a systemic issue, where universities with substantial endowments continue to rely on taxpayer money for research that may not justify the costs, calling for urgent reforms to funding structures.
Kelley is blocking a 15% cap on taxpayer coverage for indirect costs tied to NIH grants, despite evidence of misuse of funds by institutions.
Taxpayers are funding expensive studies while universities enjoy financial windfalls through high indirect costs, raising questions about fiscal responsibility in grant allocations.
Harvard's study on societal dynamics, funded heavily by indirect costs, highlights the inefficiencies in the current funding model for scientific research.
Private contracts often don't cover indirect costs, yet universities like Harvard continue to benefit from taxpayer-funded grants without accountability.
Collection
[
|
...
]