""The question of whether or not we should call Pluto a planet distracts from the real scientific issues," says Amanda Hendrix, a researcher at the Planetary Science Institute in Boulder, Colorado."
""It's wild to 'make Pluto a planet again' while decimating the careers of those of us that study it," planetary scientist Adeen Denton wrote on BlueSky."
"David Grinspoon, an astrobiologist at the Planetary Science Institute in Washington DC, states that there is still 'a genuine debate' on this controversy and favors reopening the discussion."
"Grinspoon adds that NASA weighing in on the subject could be counterproductive because it's a decision that should be taken at the international level."
NASA administrator Jared Isaacman supports restoring Pluto's planetary status, stating the agency is preparing papers for the scientific community. This remark has ignited debate among researchers, with some supporting the proposal while others oppose it, arguing it distracts from more pressing scientific issues. Concerns have also been raised about the timing of Isaacman's statement, as it coincides with proposed cuts to NASA's science budget, leading to frustrations among astronomers about the future of their field.
Read at Nature
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]