The Loch Ness Monster, affectionately called Nessie, has been a subject of debate for nearly a century. Tim Coulson, a zoologist at Oxford, argues it is a "biological impossibility" for such a creature to exist. He points out that no skeletal remains or credible photographic evidence has been uncovered. Reports of sightings are attributed to misidentifications of floating debris or low-flying birds. Coulson's conclusion echoes the skepticism surrounding other cryptids like Bigfoot, emphasizing the need for substantial evidence to validate claims of such creatures.
The absence of skeletal remains and any credible photos are strong and reliable indicators that Nessie, Bigfoot and the Yeti don't exist.
In the case of the Loch Ness Monster, they are either seeing bits of floating debris, or a bird such as a cormorant with a longish neck.
Collection
[
|
...
]