Russell Brand's claims about Wi-Fi signals being harmful are unfounded; current scientific consensus states that Wi-Fi radiation is non-ionizing and not a health risk.
Wi-Fi signals, despite being a form of radiation, operate on a non-ionizing spectrum that does not possess the energy necessary to damage human DNA.
The fear surrounding Wi-Fi radiation causing cancer is misplaced, as non-ionizing radiation like that from Wi-Fi lacks the mechanism to induce cellular damage.
Current scientific evidence discredits claims about Wi-Fi signals as 'evil energies' or harmful, emphasizing that such radiation is safe for human exposure.
Collection
[
|
...
]