A federal court allowed a lawsuit against the NIH to advance, challenging the cancellation of $2.4 billion in research grants. Plaintiffs argue these cuts violate the Administrative Procedure Act and the Fifth Amendment, citing lack of proper explanation in cancellation notices. Most affected grants focus on critical issues like vaccine hesitancy and health equity. Judge William Young emphasized the need for adequate reasoning in agency decisions, signifying potential arbitrary actions and the significance of transparency in government funding practices.
the very least, the letters were insufficient and may represent arbitrary action that lacks a fair explanation.
The lawsuit underscores the tension between public health priorities and federal funding trends, emphasizing the importance of transparency in grant decision-making.
Collection
[
|
...
]