The federal appeals court found that Sarah Palin's original trial against The New York Times was flawed due to erroneous rulings by the presiding judge.
Ms. Palin's appeal argued that key evidence was excluded and that the jury may have been influenced by the judge's premature comments on the lawsuit.
The three-judge panel stated that Judge Rakoff’s errors undermined the verdict's reliability, leading to the decision for a new trial.
Palin's lawyer highlighted the significance of the new trial as a step toward holding publishers accountable for misleading content.
Collection
[
|
...
]