Harvey Weinstein's Conviction Was Fragile From the Start
Briefly

The criminal case against Weinstein was fragile and based on risky bets. Despite overwhelming evidence of sexual misconduct, the conviction was undone due to insufficient concrete evidence and a controversial strategy.
Prosecutors faced challenges with limited victims for a criminal trial, many cases falling under civil violations or beyond statutes of limitations. The strategy of using additional 'Molineux witnesses' backfired in establishing a pattern of predation.
Read at www.nytimes.com
[
add
]
[
|
|
]