"There has been a spate of these gambling cases recently, I will say that the evidence in this case shows that the monetization of college athletics, through the liberalization and proliferation of sports betting markets, as well as the normalization of compensation in athletics, furthered the enterprise ... But it's complicated, right? As we allege in the indictment, certain players were targeted because they were somewhat missing out on NIL money and they were being targeted so they could supplement their NIL compensation."
"Each defendant is presumed innocent in a court of law, but anyone from the court of public opinion who reads the 70-page indictment would likely concede that evidence of malfeasance is strong."
"Too many participants to maintain a conspiracy, too much money wagered on obscure games to remain under the radar and way, way too many incriminating text messages."
A federal case resulted in the arrest of 26 individuals connected to a college basketball point-shaving scheme that tainted dozens of games over two seasons. The case links the liberalization of sports betting and the monetization of college athletics, including NIL compensation, to opportunities exploited by conspirators. Investigators cite numerous participants, large wagers on obscure games and extensive incriminating text messages as strong evidence. Some players were targeted because they lacked NIL income and were approached to supplement compensation. The circumstances are complex but monetary pressures do not excuse alleged criminal conduct; defendants remain presumed innocent.
Read at ESPN.com
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]