The article discusses the ethical implications of Paul, Weiss law firm's cooperation with the Trump administration, as expressed by a former pro bono coordinator. It draws parallels to historical figures who bravely opposed injustice, encouraging law firms to collectively resist compromising their principles for financial gain. The writer reflects on familial connections to the law firm and expresses disappointment over its perceived capitulation, emphasizing that adhering to legal principles is vital for democracy's strength.
Powerful law firms across the country should similarly step up. Their collective adherence to principle would mean that clients had nowhere else to go, and would cause the administration to lose its power over law firms.
Regardless of any short term financial gains, the firm is on the wrong side of history. We remember Pete Seeger refusing to name names while offering to sing a song.
Both of these lawyers would have been horrified by Brad Karp's capitulation to the Trump administration. They might even have called the $40 million deal a payoff.
The rule of law and democracy would then be strengthened if law firms adhered to their principles and stood against the administration's demands.
Collection
[
|
...
]