After nearly a year and a half of war, Israelis overwhelmingly desire a comprehensive investigation into the events surrounding October 7. This demand is fueled by both former hostages and military officials. Meanwhile, Prime Minister Netanyahu is resistant to the inquiry, fearing it may implicate him for Israel's unpreparedness against Hamas. Israel has a legal framework for such investigations, typically led by supreme court justices, which can reveal failures and suggest official dismissals. Historical precedents exist, notably an inquiry after the 1973 Yom Kippur War, which reshaped political accountability.
A serious probe will likely hold Netanyahu responsible for Hamas catching Israel unprepared. Its conclusions could echo the signs directed at the prime minister at street protests: You're the boss. You're guilty.
The demand for such an inquiry has escalated, voiced in equal measure by gaunt ex-hostages and the outgoing, guilt-ridden, military chief of staff.
Commissions of inquiry are the normal mechanism by which Israeli governance reckons with its response to extraordinary events.
The panel can subpoena witnesses and documents. It can find individuals responsible for actions and omissions.
Collection
[
|
...
]