Adams' legal team asserts that the bribery charges against him fail to meet federal standards, citing a recent Supreme Court ruling related to corruption convictions.
The motion states, 'In this circumstance, the federal rules entitle Adams to a swift dismissal of the charge,' highlighting perceived deficiencies in the indictment.
Adams' attorneys argue that the indictment lacks direct evidence of communication between the mayor and the Turkish official, questioning the basis for the bribery claim.
The charges stem from accusations of a ten-year scheme involving unreported travel benefits and illegal campaign donations in exchange for political favors.
Collection
[
|
...
]