Federal District Judge Dale E. Ho ruled to dismiss the criminal corruption charges against New York Mayor Eric Adams, criticizing the Trump administration's handling of the case. While denying the Justice Department's request to revive the charges later, he stressed the implications of using such threats for political gain. Judge Ho condemned the false pretenses under which the administration had sought dismissal and emphasized the importance of maintaining equal justice. His ruling also suggested that there might have been inappropriate connections between the case's dismissal and immigration policies, although he refrained from stating any explicit quid pro quo existed.
If in fact D.O.J.'s immigration enforcement rationale amounts to a quid pro quo to extract policy concessions from the Mayor, then it is difficult to imagine a more egregious example of the kind of prosecutorial harassment.
Judge Ho criticized the Trump administration's arguments in favor of dismissing the case as largely made under false pretenses, undermining the tradition of equal justice for all.
Collection
[
|
...
]