A recent analysis by lobbying accountability group F Minus reveals that several lobbying firms are serving contradictory interests, representing both Elon Musk-associated companies and the public agencies advocating for climate-friendly transit initiatives. This dual representation raises ethical concerns, particularly as lobbying firms help shape policies on both sides of the climate crisis. Executive Director James Browning highlighted the absurdity of these conflicts, indicating that laws permitting such practices are inadequate, especially when compared to the stricter requirements placed on legal representatives in the judicial realm.
"They're basically playing both sides of the climate crisis," Browning said in an interview with Streetsblog. "There are even instances where they're pushing for environmental bills on behalf of these clients - [which are meant to address] issues that have been caused by their other clients."
Browning explains that unlike lawyers, who are barred from serving as both prosecution and defense on the same case, weak laws in many states allow lobbying firms to represent the interests of clients on all sides of an issue - even when those interests are directly opposed.
Collection
[
|
...
]