Dismissed Queens criminal case highlights discovery debate
Briefly

Recent court rulings in Queens highlight the ongoing debate surrounding New York's evidence-sharing laws, specifically the 2019 discovery reforms. In the case of People v. Coley, charges against four defendants were dropped due to the Queens district attorney's failure to disclose critical evidence, violating their right to a speedy trial. These reforms mandate that prosecutors disclose all evidence within 180 days post-arraignment, a change seen as burdensome by district attorneys. As budget negotiations stall, concerns persist over the implications of these reforms on judicial processes and prosecutorial responsibilities.
The court ruled in People v. Coley that when the Queens district attorney's office declared they were ready for trial, they had failed to disclose several required pieces of evidence.
The dismissal is a direct result of the state's 2019 discovery reforms, which require prosecutors to submit all evidence within a certain time frame.
Read at Brooklyn Eagle
[
|
]