Tasheem Jenkins has managed to delay eviction from a rent-stabilized apartment for nearly two years through various arguments, despite losing multiple court decisions. Jenkins was never an authorized tenant or sublettor, as the arrangement with the original tenant was kept secret from the landlord. A judge found merit in the landlord's claims yet allowed Jenkins more time to demonstrate mental health issues that may affect his legal competency. This scenario underscores the complexities of housing court and the often-protracted nature of eviction proceedings in New York City.
The saga has taken another turn, involving a subletter who refuses to leave a former apartment, showing how justice can be elusive for landlords.
Jenkins has lost several court decisions but delays eviction by raising new defenses, managing to stay in the apartment long after the tenant abandoned it.
A judge found merit in the landlord's claim that Jenkins, never an authorized tenant, cannot challenge the recovery of the unit despite his prolonged stay.
Despite recognizing the landlord's logical argument, the judge has allowed Jenkins more time to demonstrate mental issues that could necessitate a guardian's representation.
Collection
[
|
...
]