A federal court, led by Judge Jon S. Tigar, ruled in favor of various health and LGBTQ+ organizations that faced threats or loss of funding due to Trump’s executive orders. The ruling specifically blocks measures aimed at enforcing diversity and equity initiatives while reflecting a broader critique of anti-trans policies. This decision is significant as it not only helps to secure ongoing funding for important healthcare initiatives but also reinforces the notion that previous directives were fundamentally discriminatory. Legal analysis underscores that the court found no legitimate justification for targeting gender-related programs, marking a critical precedent in LGBTQ+ rights.
Plaintiffs argue that the Gender Termination Provision and Gender Promotion Provision fail any level of scrutiny because the Gender Order is "transparently motivated by a 'bare desire to harm' transgender people."
Defendants offer no response in their opposition, nor any argument that either provision advances any legitimate government interest, and thus concede the point.
Collection
[
|
...
]