Judge David Miller commented on the case, noting a troubling pattern of behavior: "Some of the evidence was that he was getting special favours or treatment. He may have been bragging to another prisoner about the power that he had over this person." This highlights serious ethical concerns regarding the influence McSweeney had while incarcerated.
Prosecutor Polly Dyer explained the CPS's rationale for dropping the charges: "A full review of the case against McSweeney had been undertaken 'at the highest level of the CPS' and 'the Crown's view is to offer no evidence'." This indicates a significant re-evaluation of the evidence available.
A CPS spokesperson stated that following their review, there was 'insufficient evidence' to prove McSweeney's guilt in connection to the encouragement or assistance of an indictable offence, underscoring the challenges in prosecuting cases complicated by prison dynamics.
Collection
[
|
...
]