The Wisconsin Supreme Court is considering arguments regarding a proposed ban on conversion therapy, which has been vetoed twice by the Republican-controlled Joint Committee for the Review of Administrative Rules. The case raises significant questions about legislative overreach and the power of the state’s governor. Notably, while liberal justices expressed concern about legislative interference in life-saving rules, conservative justices defended the constitutional authority of the legislature. The outcome could impact not only conversion therapy regulations but also potential legislative authority over executive actions.
Conversion therapy is a deeply controversial practice, with evidence suggesting it leads to adverse effects on mental health rather than any meaningful changes in sexual orientation.
Liberal Justice Jill Karofsky questioned the legitimacy of allowing a small group of legislators to override life-saving rules established by the executive branch.
#conversion-therapy #lgbtq-rights #wisconsin-supreme-court #legislative-authority #political-divisions
Collection
[
|
...
]