We've spent years covering the Lucy Letby case - here's why experts are still arguing about it
Briefly

Letby’s conviction rests on circumstantial evidence without direct observation of her harming a baby, creating significant doubts about the safety and validity of the jury’s verdict.
Leading statisticians question the robustness of the evidence grid used in the trial, suggesting that without knowing the selection criteria, it becomes more visual tool than solid proof.
Read at www.bbc.com
[
|
]