There's Just Not Scientific Evidence That Gender Medicine for Teens Should Be Restricted
Briefly

The Cass Review is complex, containing both scientifically rigorous aspects and egregious oversights, highlighting the challenges in determining the benefits versus downsides of new medical care for children.
Concerns surrounding the delivery of gender services in the U.K. prompted the Cass Review to thoroughly investigate the use of puberty blockers and hormones in transgender children.
Debates on access to gender medicine for children are intensifying globally, as shown by legislative actions in the U.S. leading to outright bans and widespread misinformation.
Read at Slate Magazine
[
|
]