The panel questioned the definitions of "information services" and "telecommunications services," highlighting the complexities and legal ramifications of FCC regulations under Title II.
Jeff Wall emphasized that the Major Questions Doctrine indicates that significant federal agency decisions should have clear Congressional authorization, marking this case as extraordinarily significant in regulatory terms.
Jacob Lewis argued the case is about statutory interpretation, asserting that the Major Questions doctrine is only relevant when an agency claims unexpected power.
The determination of whether internet service qualifies as a "telecommunications service" hinges on Congress's delegation to the FCC, rooted in the Communications Act.
Collection
[
|
...
]