Should you be using AI for performance reviews?
Briefly

Should you be using AI for performance reviews?
"Before you can even get the opportunity to impress a human interviewer, you will first need to impress the algorithm! More recently, AI has also been used to assist current employees in doing their jobs and then to help their employers evaluate how well employees are performing in those jobs."
"Traditional performance evaluations (often an onerous, annual ritual based on subjective, "noisy," and unreliable or invalid manager feedback) are indeed being disrupted by algorithms capable of analyzing workflows, communication patterns, and even "relational analytics" (mining the digital footprints of your exchanges with coworkers) in real-time, which critics lament as a form of "surveillance capitalism.""
"These tools put unprecedented power in the hands of organizations to pursue data-driven management decisions which, at their best, can make workplaces fairer and more meritocratic, but at their worst, seem uncomfortably close to an Orwellian big brother dystopia and can erode trust and morale."
Digital innovations have transformed recruitment and performance evaluation through AI systems that assess job applicants before human review and monitor current employee performance in real-time. AI adoption is widespread across knowledge economy jobs, with at least 70% of workers regularly using AI at work, though actual usage is likely higher due to undisclosed implementation. These algorithms analyze workflows, communication patterns, and digital interactions between coworkers, replacing traditional subjective manager evaluations. While AI-driven performance management can enable fairer, data-driven decisions and more meritocratic workplaces, critics raise concerns about surveillance capitalism and erosion of employee trust and morale, creating a tension between potential benefits and dystopian risks.
Read at Fast Company
Unable to calculate read time
[
|
]