"The database, a cornerstone of scientific racism ideology that was first published in 2002, is being used in online propaganda by a new generation of well-funded race science activists," highlighting the ongoing relevance and misuse of Lynn's work.
"Mainstream geneticists consider it a pseudoscience without credible supporting evidence," pointing to the strong consensus among credible scientists that Lynn's research lacks the rigor necessary to be considered valid.
"There have been repeated calls for publishers to retract Lynn's papers or flag concerns about their reliability with warning notices," underscoring the growing demand from the academic community for accountability in published research.
"Academics who have evaluated his papers allege that Lynn...systematically biased data to produce implausibly low IQ scores for sub-Saharan nations," bringing attention to the serious methodological flaws in Lynn's work that raise ethical concerns.
Collection
[
|
...
]