Opinion | A King? A Pawn? A Rogue? The Founders Could Barely Imagine a President
Briefly

The delegates to the Constitutional Convention struggled profoundly with the concept of a presidency, resulting in a design meant to distance itself from monarchy, with concerns over potential tyranny.
Jefferson's initial reaction to the Constitution reflected his distaste for the presidency's power, comparing it unfavorably to that of a Polish king, showcasing unease about centralized authority.
The debates at the Constitutional Convention revealed deep anxieties about a singular executive, with proposals like a multi-member board being rejected in favor of a powerful, singular presidency.
Hamilton's advocacy for a robust executive contrasted sharply with the general consensus at the Convention, which sought to ensure the presidency remained distinct from imperial rule.
Read at www.nytimes.com
[
|
]