""Microsoft can escape this because its share in search is relatively small," said Pareekh Jain, CEO at Pareekh Consulting. "Google is the dominant player. On the other hand, the case shapes the perception that big tech still squeezes smaller players. Many European tech companies have depended on US platforms. If antitrust enforcement becomes more selective in a broader context, you will see a stronger business case and public support for 'sovereign' approaches in Europe, including sovereign AI.""
"Analysts say European regulators are becoming more selective about which complaints proceed, with greater emphasis on the merits and the market where the conduct occurs."
"For Microsoft's customers and partners, the concern is dependence on a platform that also competes in adjacent services. Microsoft's dual role, supplying technology while competing with smaller firms, creates a natural tension, according to Tulika Sheel, senior VP at Kadence International."
European regulators are increasingly selective about which complaints proceed, prioritizing the merits and the market where the conduct occurs. Microsoft faces less scrutiny in search because its market share there is relatively small, while Google remains the dominant player. The case reinforces perceptions that large technology companies can squeeze smaller rivals and many European tech firms have relied on U.S. platforms. Increased selectivity in antitrust enforcement could strengthen the business case and public backing for European 'sovereign' approaches, including sovereign AI. Microsoft's dual role as platform provider and competitor creates tensions for its customers and partners.
Read at Computerworld
Unable to calculate read time
Collection
[
|
...
]