Heldreth argues the DEA's actions not only violate federal law but also disobey constitutional principles, emphasizing a pattern of disregarding agencies recommending rescheduling cannabis.
Despite clear evidence of cannabis's medical benefits from major health organizations, the DEA's refusal to reschedule marijuana contradicts established medical consensus and legal expectations.
The lawsuit highlights the DEA's failure to consult with Native American tribes on rescheduling marijuana, raising concerns about its impact on tribal law enforcement and health.
Heldreth's complaint also questions the constitutionality of the process by which DEA's Administrative Law Judges are appointed, citing potential violations of Article II.
Collection
[
|
...
]