How do we introduce assisted dying? Experts and politicians hope someone else has the answer | Gaby Hinsliff
Briefly

During a recent committee hearing, Chief Medical Officer Prof Sir Chris Whitty displayed neutrality regarding assisted dying for terminally ill patients. While he addressed some concerns about doctors' ability to predict impending death, he refrained from expressing a personal stance. The debate revealed varied opinions, notably from the General Medical Council and the British Medical Association, with the latter shifting from opposition to neutrality. The hearing underscored critical questions about the experience of dying, rather than just the timeframe, reflecting growing interest and concerns among medical professionals and society at large.
Whitty's voice brings back memories of pandemic guidance, but on assisted dying, he remained neutral, emphasizing that the decision lies with society.
The Chief Medical Officer declined to take a stance on assisted dying, stating he must remain neutral, highlighting societal responsibility in such decisions.
Doctors are increasingly neutral on assisted dying, a shift shown by the British Medical Association's change, indicating evolving perspectives among medical professionals.
The discussion on assisted dying reveals complexities, with concerns not just about six months left to live, but also about pain and dignity in dying.
Read at www.theguardian.com
[
|
]