Amendment 2 proposed in Florida aims to enshrine the right to hunt and fish in the state constitution, fueling debates over traditional vs. scientific wildlife management.
Supporters, like the NRA and CSF, argue that this amendment is a necessary safeguard against perceived anti-hunting movements and to preserve cultural traditions of sportsmanship.
Opponents express concern that the amendment’s vague language, particularly regarding 'traditional methods,' could undermine scientific wildlife management and lead to potential abuses.
Funding for Amendment 2 has surged to nearly $1.3 million, significantly outpacing the efforts of its opponents, highlighting strong support amongst pro-hunting constituents.
Collection
[
|
...
]