Gogic's lawyers argue that by using surveillance conducted by overseas partners, US prosecutors bypassed constitutional protections, raising critical questions about the legality of such evidence.
This case is unprecedented as it aims to challenge the use of evidence obtained through foreign surveillance methods, which typically would be restricted under US legal frameworks.
Prosecutors assert that the data obtained from the French operation is similar to standard data obtained from US telecoms, thus arguing for its admissibility.
Corozzo highlighted the challenges faced due to Gogic being a non-US citizen, arguing that the legal standards for excluding evidence are more burdensome for him.
Collection
[
|
...
]